Homebuyers are being refused mortgages due to ‘free’ solar panels



RICS is urging caution to potential buyers looking at properties with ‘free’ PV panels, as it may lead to their mortgage application being declined.

At a time when many prospective buyers are struggling to secure the necessary finance to purchase a new home, they are hitting further difficulties with banks and building societies refusing to lend on properties with roofs leased for the use of ‘free’ PV panels.

These panels are installed by solar companies for free who then sell any extra energy generated back to the grid under the government’s Feed-in Tariff (FiT) subsidy. These schemes are usually based on leases of 25 years for use of the roof space, which require the prior approval of the mortgage lender – something many lenders are refusing to give.

Commenting on the issue, RICS Residential spokesperson for the West Midlands, Richard Franklin of Edward Gallimore Estate Agents, said:

Given the reluctance of lenders to release mortgage funds, even the slightest deviation from the norm can cause problems. Free PV panels fall into this category and thus, any agreement without a ‘buy out’ clause may be sufficient cause for a mortgage not to be granted. RICS are advising members to inform homebuyers of these issues and strongly urge anyone looking to make an offer on a property with ‘free’ PV panels to seek legal advice and consult their mortgage lender beforehand.

Richard Franklin, RICS Residential spokesperson for the West Midlands


Buyers are more likely to be granted a mortgage on schemes complying with the Council of Mortgage Lenders guidance, where necessary consents have been achieved and the PV panels installed to an accredited standard and maintained. However, even compliant schemes may reach difficulties as most mortgage lenders have their own specific requirements due to the lack of regulation and standardisation in roof lease contracts, with most lenders assessing on a case by case basis.

Where a mortgage lender does refuse the mortgage on the basis of the roof-lease, the best case scenario is for the solar company to offer a ‘buy-out’ option to the prospective buyer, who can purchase the installation at the price stated in the original lease agreement, less depreciation. However, this can be very costly for the new owner who may already be pushing their finances to the limit with the property purchase.

In the worst case scenario, the installation company could refuse to sell the installation to the new homeowner and seek to charge them for removing the panels and the loss of income from the feed-in tariff, effectively prohibiting the sale of the property.