Why track record matters in development finance

Property development is often described as being about location, planning and profitability.

For development lenders, another factor sits near the top of the underwriting process: track record.

Two developers can present similar schemes with similar projected returns and planning status, yet receive very different lending terms. In many cases, the difference comes down to experience.

Track record helps lenders assess whether a borrower has the capability to deliver a project successfully, manage challenges during construction and achieve the proposed exit.

What lenders mean by track record

Track record is not simply a measure of how long someone has worked in property.

Lenders typically look at:

• previous development projects
• scheme size and complexity
• delivery history
• project profitability
• build quality
• experience within the proposed asset class
• professional team and advisers
• evidence of successful exits

The relevance of experience often depends on the project being funded.

A developer with a strong history of residential conversions may not automatically receive the same level of support for a large ground-up development.

Similarly, experience delivering small residential schemes may not directly translate into commercial developments, student accommodation or build-to-rent projects.

Why lenders focus on experience

Development finance involves future risk.

Unlike a standard investment property loan secured against an existing income-producing asset, a development lender is funding a project that still needs to be delivered.

That means lenders must assess more than the property itself.

They also need confidence that the borrower can:

• manage contractors
• control costs
• navigate delays
• oversee professional advisers
• respond to changing market conditions
• complete the scheme
• execute the proposed exit

Experience cannot eliminate risk, but it provides evidence of how a borrower has managed similar challenges before.

Track record and leverage

Experience can influence how a lender structures a facility.

Developers with a strong history of delivering comparable schemes may find lenders more comfortable with:

• higher leverage
• larger facility sizes
• more flexible drawdown structures
• reduced contingency requirements
• broader exit options

The opposite can also apply.

Where experience is limited, lenders may require:

• additional equity
• stronger contingency provision
• lower leverage
• more frequent monitoring
• additional professional oversight

This is not necessarily a reflection of project quality.

It is often a reflection of execution risk.

First-time developers

A lack of direct development experience does not automatically prevent funding.

Many successful developers complete their first project using development finance.

However, lenders will often place greater emphasis on other factors, including:

• strength of the professional team
• contractor experience
• project simplicity
• equity contribution
• planning status
• contingency provision
• asset quality
• exit strategy

In some cases, first-time developers start with smaller or less complex projects before progressing to larger schemes.

Why lenders look beyond completed projects

Track record is not always measured by the number of developments completed.

Lenders frequently examine how previous projects were delivered.

Questions often include:

• Were schemes completed on time?
• Were costs controlled effectively?
• Were units sold successfully?
• Were exits achieved as planned?
• How were unexpected challenges managed?

A developer who has successfully navigated difficult projects may provide stronger evidence than someone whose experience comes solely from favourable market conditions.

The role of the wider team

Development finance underwriting rarely focuses on a single individual.

Lenders also review the wider delivery team.

This can include:

• architects
• planning consultants
• quantity surveyors
• contractors
• project managers
• solicitors
• accountants

A strong professional team can provide additional confidence, particularly where a borrower is taking on a more ambitious scheme.

Why track record matters in the current market

Development funding remains available across a wide range of sectors.

However, lenders continue to place close attention on:

• build costs
• project delivery
• sales rates
• refinancing options
• exit certainty

As a result, the ability to demonstrate successful project delivery has become an important part of the underwriting process.

The strongest applications typically combine:

• realistic appraisals
• sensible leverage
• clear exit planning
• experienced sponsorship
• transparent communication

Development finance is about delivery

Property development is not simply about acquiring a site and obtaining planning permission.

Lenders are funding a process that must be managed through construction, completion and exit.

For that reason, track record remains one of the most important factors in development finance underwriting.

The quality of the asset matters.

The quality of the plan matters.

But lenders also want confidence that the team behind the project can deliver what has been proposed.

FOLLOW ON GOOGLE NEWSADD AS PREFERRED SOURCE